A Bit of Background

About Me and My Views on Software Development

Welcome to my blog in which I express my opinions on software development which has been my career, man-and-boy.

What's in this post?

  • Who I am
  • What I believe in


Who Am I?

My name is David Kerr, located in the London area with 20+ years experience in developing software in a diverse range of industries, including defence, medical, telecoms, finance and latterly managed print services.

I started off programming Basic (woot!) and assembler on Commodore 64's, breaking game loaders, writing games and mucking about with external hardware. Since then I've programmed in Pascal, C and C++. I currently develop in Java though I'm learning Scala and Dart at the moment.

What do I Believe in?

Focussing on my software development beliefs, a short summary is: -


General Development Beliefs

  • There are no absolutes in development. Period. There are always caveats and alternatives. I am not interested in wars about languages, OS's or frameworks.
  • Make things better for our customers. Get close to them, put yourself in their shoes, see your software being used, be embarrassed by the wrong assumptions and pain-points.
  • I value KISS, DRY and YAGNI.
  • Agile is the way forward.
  • The code expresses the design, but there's no harm in modelling and communicating with UML. A picture is worth a 1000 words.
  • Working in supportive and collaborative teams where there is buzz and banter is far more pleasant and productive than teams of rocket-scientists vying for dominance.
  • Try and write software that is understandable: code is read and maintained far more than it is written.
  • Don't show off how clever you are (and by extension how stupid I am). 
    • Writing something in 1 line of code that can be more clearly expressed in more may make you feel superior but it just annoys me.
  • Always try to grow as a developer, be open to new languages and ideas. 
    • This is something I look for in colleagues.
  • I still love software development even after all these years of seeing so much crap. It is more than just a job.

Object Oriented Development

  • I like OO development, feeling that it allows natural encapsulation of concepts and the bundling of data and behaviour together.
  • I am saddened that the potential of OO has been sullied by programmers who have not had the various "light-bulb" moments of OO and use classes as mere wrappers of procedural code.
  • I detest the bean programming model (get/set hell) that masquerades as OO. I will likely post about this more in the future.
  • I don't think OO can answer all problems elegantly: use the right tool for the job
    • I look for better approaches, new languages.
    • I am not prepared to "throw the baby out with the bathwater"
  • I am happy to mix OO with functional and dynamic languages

Comments

  1. Unknown15 February 2013 at 05:04

    A good start. I look forwards to see where this writing leads you. Also I liked the links you provided.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sleep, Lord's Prayer, Now and the Future

I'm writing some posts about my journey as a new Christian.  Currently I'm very much in the low foothills of faith. I pray these posts may help someone. Woke up early, again. Hey ho. Nowadays, when I remember, I turn to the Lord; sometimes I pray for my Christian brothers and sisters, my family, those I know in need. Woo, get me. Usually I do some breathing exercises whilst repeating The Lord's Prayer. Often this settles my mind and I wake later having dropped off. Nice. Not always and this morning I didn't drop off but Praise the Lord I felt enough oomph to pull myself from my bed to write this blog. I follow Jesus. I still don't know (or do I?) what this really means and I often feel a fraud, squinting at myself like "you do? are you sure? what does THAT even mean?", but a year or so back I "made the decision" to become a Christian as I just couldn't work it all out for myself. I gave in. All the efforts with full-on psycho-analysis, mindfu...
Read more

Project Valhalla Space-Time Continuum

Image
Project Valhalla Space-Time Continuum Background Currently, for all its talents, Java at the lowest level cannot be as efficient in space and time measurements as a language such as C or C++ due to the simple fact it can only use object references and not linearize objects. This significantly affects applications with large data-sets where the overhead of object headers and references adds up. Project Valhalla will enable far more efficient storage (space) and processing (time) of large data-sets with the introduction of value-types . For example, an array of 10M `PricePoint` objects (each of which has two 64-bit primitive fields) will take 320MB in Java but only 160MB in C++ (these numbers will be justified below). Furthermore processing every object in that array will likely cause many, many CPU cache misses with all the resultant slow down as main-memory is accessed to load the references. Disclaimers I hope to demonstrate equivalent Java and C++ code and...
Read more